Angelica Raggi vs Ilinca Sagmar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Sagmar has a slight edge in second serve performance, capturing 42.02% of points over the last six months, while Raggi trails with 38.67%. Could this difference in second serve performance be crucial for match outcomes? Often, it is.
• In terms of returning serve, Sagmar excels in winning points off their opponent's second serve at 54.96%, compared to Raggi's 50.12%. However, Raggi is more effective in first serve returns, taking 37.15% of those points to Sagmar’s 30.24%.
• When it comes to breakpoints saved, Raggi demonstrates a slightly better resilience, saving 50.14% compared to Sagmar's 46.49%.
• Sagmar’s match win rate over the past year stands at 54.17%, with Raggi's matching ability slightly lower at 50%. Over a year-long timeframe, Sagmar has shown a slim advantage.
• Sagmar plays best on Clay with a 55% career win rate, while Hard courts favor Raggi, where they have won 64% of matches.
• Examining player levels, Sagmar predominantly competes in Futures tournaments, whereas Raggi has more experience at Challengers level, which can impact expectations concerning match competitiveness.
• The quality of competition is significant, and here Sagmar has faced higher-ranked opponents (average rank of 221.5) compared to Raggi (average rank of 399.36).
• In deciding sets, Sagmar has a narrow edge, winning 42% of them compared to Raggi's 40% over the past year.
• Sagmar has a slightly higher breakpoint conversion rate of 45% against Raggi's 43.24%, providing a marginal advantage in clutch situations.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

As we prepare for this intriguing tennis match-up, key statistics highlight subtle differences in their competitive arcs. Sagmar's slight edge in second serve performance and the ability to challenge opponent’s second serve returns may prove decisive. This capability, combined with a higher rate of converting breakpoints, suggests they have a marginal advantage.

While Raggi demonstrates stronger resilience under pressure, with a higher percentage in saving breakpoints and first serve return efficiency, their overall win rate and second serve performance lag behind Sagmar’s.

Considering both players' recent trends, match experiences, and face-off history, Sagmar enters as the slight favorite to win this forthcoming encounter, though the margin of advantage suggests a closely contested match lies ahead.